User talk:Rebecca1990: Difference between revisions
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) Created page with "== Welcome! == Hi Rebecca, welcome to Pornopedia and thanks for your contributions! It's so great that you write such detailed articles! I'm sorry, but since we have really s..." |
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) →New AVS templates: new section |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm sorry, but since we have really strict laws in Germany when it comes to youth protection, I was forced to AVS protect some of the links (or if it was not a clickable link, I had to remove the .com). Categories like "Born June 2" or " Born 1988" will be inserted automatically by the date of birth template. If you have any questions or suggestions, please let me know. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 21:30, 15 September 2016 (CEST) | I'm sorry, but since we have really strict laws in Germany when it comes to youth protection, I was forced to AVS protect some of the links (or if it was not a clickable link, I had to remove the .com). Categories like "Born June 2" or " Born 1988" will be inserted automatically by the date of birth template. If you have any questions or suggestions, please let me know. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 21:30, 15 September 2016 (CEST) | ||
Well, excluding mentions of ".com" from articles is easy, but I don't know how to do the AVS protection of links. Is it ok for me to just continue writing articles like I've done so far, and then have you AVS protect the links, or is it problematic for links like those to remain in an article for hours or even days until you protect them? Before writing an article, should I message you with the links that will be in it so that you can protect them? Also, which links require protection? You protected all links containing nudity except for these two: [https://avn.com/business/articles/video/Digital-Playground-Wraps-Abigail-Mac-s-First-Boy-Girl-Scene-581571.html] & [http://aipdaily.com/2013/interview-with-cherie-deville/]. Are exposed breasts ok to link without AVS protection but genitals not? --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 22:06, 18 September 2016 (CEST) | |||
: Hi Rebecca, thank you for being so cool about it! It would be fantastic if you could comment those links out, like with <code><nowiki><!--- http://www.domain.com/ ---></nowiki></code>. I will then edit them as soon as possible. Nude pictures (like the Pornopedia logo) are okay, just explicit stuff is problematic (the kind of images you see on the back of a porno DVD cover: blowjobs, explicit sex, pink shots...). If we link to a website pretty often like [[FreeOnes]], I'm gonna write a little extension and template for it, like I did with [[:Template:FreeOnes]]. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 15:45, 19 September 2016 (CEST) | |||
:: Hi Rebecca, I added <code>| Nationality =</code> to the [[Pornopedia:Style_sheet_actor|infobox]] and created a template for links to the [[:Template:Adult DVD Talk|Adult DVD Talk interviews]]. I also copied code from the German Pornopedia so that the zodiac sign categories are inserted automatically (thanks to [[User:Kenji|Kenji]]!). To AVS protect Twitter links, you can use the [[:Template:Twitter AVS|Twitter AVS]] template. Oh, and sorry, logging in is weird today: I had to log in twice. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:56, 20 September 2016 (CEST) | |||
::: Hi Rebecca, I created a [[Template:Fleshbot|Fleshbot template]]. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 23:02, 22 September 2016 (CEST) | |||
* Hi Rebecca1990! I also wrote quite a bit in Wikipedia about pornography (in different languages), but the politics there on the pornography version is terribly wrong, especially in English. I have probably written over a thousand articles there, but I'm already moving here. I'll be glad to help!--[[User:Best tori|Best tori]] ([[User talk:Best tori|talk]]) 10:22, 18 May 2018 (CEST) | |||
== Zoë == | |||
Hi Rebecca1990, I think the [[Zoë#References|Xcitement link]] is okay since the article has no images and if a visitor should click that last thumbnail, due to the shadows he can hardly see any details. If it would be a brightly lit picture showing explicit sex action like double penetration, I would probably protect the link because it's on the same server (if it's an external link, I don't follow each link to see if I possibly end up on a site showing explicit content). But thank you for being so thoroughly, I really appreciate it! Cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:23, 25 October 2016 (CEST) | |||
== Italic movie titles/internal links == | |||
Hi Rebecca, is there a special reason why you use italic movie titles or is it just a personal preference? Right now, I honestly don't see how this improves the title. We use italic titles for things like TV shows in the biography section when the TV show has no own article, but I never saw it in the title of an article before. I also don't really understand why you removed the internal link to [[pornography]] in [https://en.pornopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Dirty_Daniels&diff=next&oldid=18083 this edit]; okay, the pornography article is not very comprehensive right now, but eventually, I'm gonna improve it. Have a nice weekend! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 14:31, 19 November 2016 (CET) | |||
: Sorry about my first question, just found out the English Wikipedia uses italic titles too now. Personally, I don't think it helps with the readability, especially in huge filmographies of porn actors, but if people are used to it now, why not. If you prefer italic titles, I can use a bot to change the existing titles. Also, the English Wikipedia uses plural in category names; do you think we should do that too? If so, I can also change the existing categories with a bot. Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 14:51, 19 November 2016 (CET) | |||
== New AVS templates == | |||
Hello Rebecca, thank you for editing the [[Samantha Rone]] article! We have new [[Help:Contents#AVS|AVS templates]] now. For references, you can use the [[Template:Reference AVS|Reference AVS]] template. Please enter the complete URL and the title of the link, like this: <code><nowiki>{{Reference AVS|https://www.domainwithexplicitcontent.com/|Official website of Explicit Content}}</nowiki></code>. This will just insert the link with the title, the rest of the reference like the tag should be as provided as usual. I'm sorry, it took me so long to come up with a solution like this. Thanks, cheers and all the best! --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:44, 29 March 2024 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 20:44, 29 March 2024
Welcome!
Hi Rebecca, welcome to Pornopedia and thanks for your contributions! It's so great that you write such detailed articles!
I'm sorry, but since we have really strict laws in Germany when it comes to youth protection, I was forced to AVS protect some of the links (or if it was not a clickable link, I had to remove the .com). Categories like "Born June 2" or " Born 1988" will be inserted automatically by the date of birth template. If you have any questions or suggestions, please let me know. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2016 (CEST)
Well, excluding mentions of ".com" from articles is easy, but I don't know how to do the AVS protection of links. Is it ok for me to just continue writing articles like I've done so far, and then have you AVS protect the links, or is it problematic for links like those to remain in an article for hours or even days until you protect them? Before writing an article, should I message you with the links that will be in it so that you can protect them? Also, which links require protection? You protected all links containing nudity except for these two: [1] & [2]. Are exposed breasts ok to link without AVS protection but genitals not? --Rebecca1990 (talk) 22:06, 18 September 2016 (CEST)
- Hi Rebecca, thank you for being so cool about it! It would be fantastic if you could comment those links out, like with
<!--- http://www.domain.com/ --->
. I will then edit them as soon as possible. Nude pictures (like the Pornopedia logo) are okay, just explicit stuff is problematic (the kind of images you see on the back of a porno DVD cover: blowjobs, explicit sex, pink shots...). If we link to a website pretty often like FreeOnes, I'm gonna write a little extension and template for it, like I did with Template:FreeOnes. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 15:45, 19 September 2016 (CEST)
- Hi Rebecca, I added
| Nationality =
to the infobox and created a template for links to the Adult DVD Talk interviews. I also copied code from the German Pornopedia so that the zodiac sign categories are inserted automatically (thanks to Kenji!). To AVS protect Twitter links, you can use the Twitter AVS template. Oh, and sorry, logging in is weird today: I had to log in twice. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2016 (CEST)
- Hi Rebecca, I added
- Hi Rebecca, I created a Fleshbot template. Have a nice day! Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 23:02, 22 September 2016 (CEST)
- Hi Rebecca1990! I also wrote quite a bit in Wikipedia about pornography (in different languages), but the politics there on the pornography version is terribly wrong, especially in English. I have probably written over a thousand articles there, but I'm already moving here. I'll be glad to help!--Best tori (talk) 10:22, 18 May 2018 (CEST)
Zoë
Hi Rebecca1990, I think the Xcitement link is okay since the article has no images and if a visitor should click that last thumbnail, due to the shadows he can hardly see any details. If it would be a brightly lit picture showing explicit sex action like double penetration, I would probably protect the link because it's on the same server (if it's an external link, I don't follow each link to see if I possibly end up on a site showing explicit content). But thank you for being so thoroughly, I really appreciate it! Cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2016 (CEST)
Italic movie titles/internal links
Hi Rebecca, is there a special reason why you use italic movie titles or is it just a personal preference? Right now, I honestly don't see how this improves the title. We use italic titles for things like TV shows in the biography section when the TV show has no own article, but I never saw it in the title of an article before. I also don't really understand why you removed the internal link to pornography in this edit; okay, the pornography article is not very comprehensive right now, but eventually, I'm gonna improve it. Have a nice weekend! Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 14:31, 19 November 2016 (CET)
- Sorry about my first question, just found out the English Wikipedia uses italic titles too now. Personally, I don't think it helps with the readability, especially in huge filmographies of porn actors, but if people are used to it now, why not. If you prefer italic titles, I can use a bot to change the existing titles. Also, the English Wikipedia uses plural in category names; do you think we should do that too? If so, I can also change the existing categories with a bot. Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2016 (CET)
New AVS templates
Hello Rebecca, thank you for editing the Samantha Rone article! We have new AVS templates now. For references, you can use the Reference AVS template. Please enter the complete URL and the title of the link, like this: {{Reference AVS|https://www.domainwithexplicitcontent.com/|Official website of Explicit Content}}
. This will just insert the link with the title, the rest of the reference like the tag should be as provided as usual. I'm sorry, it took me so long to come up with a solution like this. Thanks, cheers and all the best! --Till Kraemer (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2024 (CET)