User talk:Till Kraemer: Difference between revisions

 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 305: Line 305:


: Hi Fikaĉu, yes, Pornopedia Data is like Wikidata but unfortunately, it doesn't work right now and I'm not sure how to fix it. I hope it will work again in one of the next MediaWiki versions. At the moment, the only reliable way to use interwiki links is to add something like <code><nowiki>[[eo:Ĉefpaĝo]]</nowiki></code> to an article to create a link to the other language version (in this case a link to the Esperanto main page). Regarding the Esperanto Pornopedia: Do you have any ideas how to translate [https://eo.pornopedia.com/wiki/Uzanto-Diskuto:Fika%C4%89u#Welcome! this] or would you like to keep it in English for now? Have a nice weekend! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:50, 17 March 2023 (CET)
: Hi Fikaĉu, yes, Pornopedia Data is like Wikidata but unfortunately, it doesn't work right now and I'm not sure how to fix it. I hope it will work again in one of the next MediaWiki versions. At the moment, the only reliable way to use interwiki links is to add something like <code><nowiki>[[eo:Ĉefpaĝo]]</nowiki></code> to an article to create a link to the other language version (in this case a link to the Esperanto main page). Regarding the Esperanto Pornopedia: Do you have any ideas how to translate [https://eo.pornopedia.com/wiki/Uzanto-Diskuto:Fika%C4%89u#Welcome! this] or would you like to keep it in English for now? Have a nice weekend! Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:50, 17 March 2023 (CET)
:: Till your translation '''"Pornopedia - La seksa enciklopedio"''' its the best option, most general of <s>seksalloga</s>! You election for '''Pornopedia''' or '''Pornopedio'''. TNK --[[User:Fikaĉu|Fikaĉu]] ([[User talk:Fikaĉu|talk]]) 13:15, 24 April 2023 (CEST)
::: Hi Fikaĉu, I'm sorry it took me so long to reply. Thank you for helping me with the translation! I just changed it. Cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:54, 26 April 2023 (CEST)


== MediaWiki:Sidebar ==
== MediaWiki:Sidebar ==
Line 328: Line 332:


Thanks
Thanks
: Hi Fikaĉu, I just added the code to the sidebar. I can also give you admin rights so you can edit the sidebar anytime you want. Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:57, 26 April 2023 (CEST)


== MediaWiki:Edittools ==
== MediaWiki:Edittools ==
Line 358: Line 364:
</div>
</div>
</pre>
</pre>
: Hi Fikaĉu, I just added the code to the Esperanto Pornopedia. Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:58, 26 April 2023 (CEST)
== AVN/XBIZ ==
If a page does not itself contain explicit content but does contain a link to a website with explicit content, does it need AVS protection as well? For example, the 4th reference at [[Hime Marie]] has within the first paragraph of the AVN article a link to a porn website (ErotiqueTVLive) that I know would be AVS protected on here. If pages like that need AVS protection, can you create AVN and XBIZ AVS templates? Better yet, is it possible to create an AVS protection template that works with any website? --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 10:07, 27 April 2023 (CEST)
: Hi Rebecca, Thank you for your great articles and thank you for being so considerate regarding the links! I think it's kinda okay if an article on another site links to a porn website because otherwise, we couldn't even link to an article from a newspaper when they mention the domain of a porn website. Having a template that works with any website is a cool idea; I haven't found a way to do it yet without hiding the domain though. Cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:41, 27 April 2023 (CEST)
::Ok. I've also used links without AVS protection which contained ads that weren't explicit, but when I later revisited/refreshed that same page, the ads were explicit/pornographic. Do pages containing explicit porn ads, even if they're not a permanent part of the page, need AVS protection? --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 17:59, 27 April 2023 (CEST)
::: If they use explicit porn ads, we should AVS protect the links. However, I don't think it's our job to monitor all sites all the time, so if there are no explicit porn ads at the time you link to that website, it's okay to not AVS protect the link and just leave it like that. Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:50, 27 April 2023 (CEST)
:::: Ok, thanks. I asked because I'm too busy to continue editing on this site and will be doing final improvements on pages I've already edited before leaving in order to not leave a mess behind. --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 23:00, 27 April 2023 (CEST)
::::: I'm sorry that you're leaving. Thank you so much for all your great articles, I really appreciate it! Cheers and all the best! --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 18:31, 28 April 2023 (CEST)
AVS, avs, Bureaucrats, editinterface, Interface administrators, oversight, staff, Administrators
19,182

edits