19,182
edits
User talk:Till Kraemer: Difference between revisions
→AVN/XBIZ
Rebecca1990 (talk | contribs) |
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 374: | Line 374: | ||
::Ok. I've also used links without AVS protection which contained ads that weren't explicit, but when I later revisited/refreshed that same page, the ads were explicit/pornographic. Do pages containing explicit porn ads, even if they're not a permanent part of the page, need AVS protection? --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 17:59, 27 April 2023 (CEST) | ::Ok. I've also used links without AVS protection which contained ads that weren't explicit, but when I later revisited/refreshed that same page, the ads were explicit/pornographic. Do pages containing explicit porn ads, even if they're not a permanent part of the page, need AVS protection? --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 17:59, 27 April 2023 (CEST) | ||
::: If they use explicit porn ads, we should AVS protect the links. However, I don't think it's our job to monitor all sites all the time, so if there are no explicit porn ads at the time you link to that website, it's okay to not AVS protect the link and just leave it like that. Thanks and cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:50, 27 April 2023 (CEST) | |||