User talk:Till Kraemer: Difference between revisions
→AVN/XBIZ
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) |
Rebecca1990 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 372: | Line 372: | ||
: Hi Rebecca, Thank you for your great articles and thank you for being so considerate regarding the links! I think it's kinda okay if an article on another site links to a porn website because otherwise, we couldn't even link to an article from a newspaper when they mention the domain of a porn website. Having a template that works with any website is a cool idea; I haven't found a way to do it yet without hiding the domain though. Cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:41, 27 April 2023 (CEST) | : Hi Rebecca, Thank you for your great articles and thank you for being so considerate regarding the links! I think it's kinda okay if an article on another site links to a porn website because otherwise, we couldn't even link to an article from a newspaper when they mention the domain of a porn website. Having a template that works with any website is a cool idea; I haven't found a way to do it yet without hiding the domain though. Cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:41, 27 April 2023 (CEST) | ||
::Ok. I've also used links without AVS protection which contained ads that weren't explicit, but when I later revisited/refreshed that same page, the ads were explicit/pornographic. Do pages containing explicit porn ads, even if they're not a permanent part of the page, need AVS protection? --[[User:Rebecca1990|Rebecca1990]] ([[User talk:Rebecca1990|talk]]) 17:59, 27 April 2023 (CEST) | |||