User talk:Xbul: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:Hello! I had to rename these categories. I have poor knowledge of English but the English Wikipedia categories are categorized otherwise. There is no point two categories concerning the same thing to sit in another category, but so be it. --[[User:Xbul|Xbul]] ([[User talk:Xbul|talk]]) 01:18, 23 February 2017 (CET) | :Hello! I had to rename these categories. I have poor knowledge of English but the English Wikipedia categories are categorized otherwise. There is no point two categories concerning the same thing to sit in another category, but so be it. --[[User:Xbul|Xbul]] ([[User talk:Xbul|talk]]) 01:18, 23 February 2017 (CET) | ||
::Hi. Okay, I understand. But please consider that this is not the Wikipedia. But Wikipedia is not the key or the answer on "how to do" or "how to name it". If there are a category named in one way, please use it as it is. And put focus on the content in the different articles. This due the reason that, categories can be sensitive to change. This when lots of articles can be pointing to a specific category. And if you are 100% that you have changed all article to new category. Dont blank it! Redirect it to the new category. //Sipzz 21:59, 23 February 2017 (CET) | ::Hi. Okay, I understand. But please consider that this is not the Wikipedia. But Wikipedia is not the key or the answer on "how to do" or "how to name it". If there are a category named in one way, please use it as it is. And put focus on the content in the different articles. This due the reason that, categories can be sensitive to change. This when lots of articles can be pointing to a specific category. And if you are 100% that you have changed all article to new category. Dont blank it! Redirect it to the new category. //Sipzz 21:59, 23 February 2017 (CET) | ||
:::Yes, in Wikipedia is not always everything is as it should. Cheers. --[[User:Xbul|Xbul]] ([[User talk:Xbul|talk]]) 07:37, 24 February 2017 (CET) | |||