Novtes
Joined 30 June 2025
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) |
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) →Category:Image needed: new section |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
: PS: Oh, okay, sorry, now I see why you did it: Because they are trans. Hmm, but since they identify as women, they are also in the "Porn actresses" category, not in the "Porn actors" category. How about we make a new category called "American transgender women" like they have on the English Wikipedia? Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 13:10, 23 August 2025 (CEST) | : PS: Oh, okay, sorry, now I see why you did it: Because they are trans. Hmm, but since they identify as women, they are also in the "Porn actresses" category, not in the "Porn actors" category. How about we make a new category called "American transgender women" like they have on the English Wikipedia? Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 13:10, 23 August 2025 (CEST) | ||
:: I'm no expert on this topic, but the word "trans" seems to be quite as common as "transgender", so how about we keep it short and do categories like "American trans women"? Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 13:25, 23 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
::: Yeah, I moved them because they should be in their own separate category [[User:Novtes|Novtes]] | |||
:::: I think it's good to talk about changes like that first, but I appreciate your suggestions. Now that we have those new categories, maybe it would also make sense to add a "Trans porn actresses" category. Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 18:16, 24 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
== Indonesia == | |||
Hello Novtes, it looks like the text you deleted in the article about [[Indonesia]] was mostly from Wikipedia, so it's good to either delete it or rewrite it. You also replaced the examples of porn actresses with a link to the category. Thank you for that new category. However, I think both can exist in an article: A few examples of people who are from Indonesia in the article, and if you want to see the whole list, you click that category link. Kinda like in the [[pornographic actor]] article. An article about anything should somehow mention how it relates to pornography or sex, but it can also contain some other facts, for example, the estimated population of a city or country, as we also mention things like hobbies in an article about an actress. Please, in general, always be cautious of what you delete. Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 14:22, 26 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
: Because I was trying to make it similar to the other country pages such as [[Philippines]] or [[South Korea]] that just have a brief/minimal one sentence or two description about where it's located. And by comparison the DE country pages have a very brief simple description: https://de.pornopedia.com/wiki/Ungarn https://de.pornopedia.com/wiki/Indonesien --[[User:Novtes|Novtes]] | |||
:: Thank you for the explanation! Articles are mostly short because we didn't have time to expand them yet, like most of the articles about actresses or studios. Usually, they should only be shortened or rewritten if there are copyright violations or if the info is wrong or not intended for the public. Articles can be pretty long if the text is interesting. I agree, though, that in the case of a country, we don't need all the historical data that appears on Wikipedia. A few facts are cool, though, and if there is anything that relates to porn or sex that can be included, too, and can result in a big article. Theoretically, this could be done with pretty much anything, like a chair or sofa, explaining how to have sex on it, or maybe there is a movie series that focuses on it that can be mentioned, etc. Think of Pornopedia as looking at the world through a sex lens :) Cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:11, 26 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
== Category:Born in Quebec == | |||
Hello, I don't understand [https://en.pornopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Category:Born_in_Quebec&diff=prev&oldid=51837 this edit]. Quebec is in Canada, so why shouldn't it be a subcategory of Canada? All categories are structured this way, for example, [[:Category:Born in California|Category:Born in California]] is a subcategory of [[:Category:United States|Category:United States]]. And again, if you make changes like that, please discuss them first. Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 16:07, 27 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
: Thank you for re-adding the category! I think categories sometimes can be pretty complex, but if we change our minds later, categories can be changed with a bot pretty easily, so we don't need to do it manually. Cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 20:36, 27 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
== Websites == | |||
Hello Novtes, I'm sorry, there are many things we've done over the years that are now outdated. When I was living in Germany, I created an AVS extension because of the strict youth protection laws there. If you see something like <code><nowiki>{{AVS|Diamond_Jackson}}</nowiki></code>, it belongs to a file with over 1000 websites that I need to add to the corresponding articles. Some of the websites are not online anymore, then they can be removed, but in the case of Diamond Jackson, the [https://en.pornopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Diamond_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=52936 website] is still online. Long story short: You can, but you don't need to [https://en.pornopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Diamond_Jackson&diff=52380&oldid=52377 remove it]; I will do it when I go through the list. Another thing: Not sure if it was intentional, but please [https://en.pornopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Mandy_Waters&diff=52361&oldid=47997 don't remove the website] from the infobox if it is still online. Technically, for short articles, one link to the website is enough, but it's more convenient to have a link in the infobox and in the external links section, especially when the articles get bigger one day. Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 13:47, 28 August 2025 (CEST) | |||
== Category:Image needed == | |||
Hello Novtes, currently, we use the Category:Image needed also for articles that only have covers, so technically they do have an image but not a photo, like for example the article about [[Belladonna]] has. I'm fine with that, but I'm also okay with not using the category for those articles. If we decide not to use the category in those cases, the category can easily be removed with a bot; it doesn't need to be done manually. Have a nice weekend! Thanks, cheers and all the best, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] ([[User talk:Till Kraemer|talk]]) 17:02, 30 August 2025 (CEST) |