User talk:Xbul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Pornopedia, the sexy encyclopedia
Revision as of 07:37, 24 February 2017 by Xbul (talk | contribs)

Welcome!

Hi Xbul, welcome to Pornopedia and thanks for your contributions! However, due to law restrictions we aren't allowed to link directly to hardcore stuff without AVS, so I secured your link at Nikita Bulgaria so that only registered users can get the URL. Thanks + Cheers, --Till Kraemer 18:26, 5 June 2011 (CEST)

Thanks for the clarification. Regards :) --Xbul (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2013 (CET)
Hi Xbul, can you please use Template:Adult Film Database and Template:FreeOnes (because of the local law restrictions mentioned above)? That would be cool! Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2017 (CET)
Okay! I wonder how to improve this template - Template:Navbox. Regards! --Xbul (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2017 (CET)
Cool, thanks! :) Hm, I think one problem was an old version of Module:Documentation‎ and I also had to add some stuff and change something. It should work now. Cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2017 (CET)
Thanks! :) --Xbul (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2017 (CET)

AdultBay

Hi Xbul, since Adult Bay seems to offer DVD rips from Wicked movies for free, I highly doubt that this site is legitimate, so please don't post any links to that site. Thanks and cheers, --Till Kraemer (talk) 16:18, 26 March 2014 (CET)

Aha. Okay! --Xbul (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2014 (CEST)

Todays edits

Hi Xbul, I have undone your edits on some categories. There you have just blanked the pages. I see that you have created and edit lots of pages and categories with countries. With I think you have some plan or similar with your edits, as I have undone. If you want think the page or category should point at another direction, or more or less just be deleted. Then please make a request about it, instead of just leave the page blank. //Sipzz 21:30, 22 February 2017 (CET)

Hello! I had to rename these categories. I have poor knowledge of English but the English Wikipedia categories are categorized otherwise. There is no point two categories concerning the same thing to sit in another category, but so be it. --Xbul (talk) 01:18, 23 February 2017 (CET)
Hi. Okay, I understand. But please consider that this is not the Wikipedia. But Wikipedia is not the key or the answer on "how to do" or "how to name it". If there are a category named in one way, please use it as it is. And put focus on the content in the different articles. This due the reason that, categories can be sensitive to change. This when lots of articles can be pointing to a specific category. And if you are 100% that you have changed all article to new category. Dont blank it! Redirect it to the new category. //Sipzz 21:59, 23 February 2017 (CET)
Yes, in Wikipedia is not always everything is as it should. Cheers. --Xbul (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2017 (CET)