User talk:Till Kraemer: Difference between revisions
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) |
Till Kraemer (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: I don't know. I like the way [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1593484/ IMDb] does it and since we will add more language versions to Pornopedia, each language/country will have it's own date format one day. Thanks + cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] 20:11, 16 May 2011 (CEST) | : I don't know. I like the way [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1593484/ IMDb] does it and since we will add more language versions to Pornopedia, each language/country will have it's own date format one day. Thanks + cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] 20:11, 16 May 2011 (CEST) | ||
:: ...the English Wikipedia also seem to use that kind of format and though that's not the best argument, people seem to be ok there with the month/day/year scheme. Cheers, --[[User:Till Kraemer|Till Kraemer]] 23:21, 16 May 2011 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 22:21, 16 May 2011
Speak.
Date format for born category
I think we should use the date format which is more common, therefore Day|Month|Year, look here, or not? -- Kenji 17:39, 16 May 2011 (CEST)
- I don't know. I like the way IMDb does it and since we will add more language versions to Pornopedia, each language/country will have it's own date format one day. Thanks + cheers, --Till Kraemer 20:11, 16 May 2011 (CEST)
- ...the English Wikipedia also seem to use that kind of format and though that's not the best argument, people seem to be ok there with the month/day/year scheme. Cheers, --Till Kraemer 23:21, 16 May 2011 (CEST)